Is healthcare reform dead?
I think this particular go-round of healthcare legislative initiatives, yes, is dead. So much misinformation, so much anger, so many threats about government interference and everything else Boehner and McConnell and McCain say from their bully pulpits; so little effective persuasion from Pelosi and Reid and, yes, even the President; so much disgust for Washington and political stagnation and machination drowning out our – the people’s – distaste for the health insurance industry in general and our own health insurance providers in particular.
Hell, even Warren Buffett suggests President Obama start over.
The fact is we have allowed ourselves to become more invested in and critical of the process than we are determined to attain our desired result. We abhor the closed doors, rue the lack of ”bi-partisanship,” lie to ourselves in a patriotic fog about the U.S.’s having the “best in the world” and disdain the posturing, preening and electioneering, all at the expense of acknowledging, confronting and dispatching the loosely tied bag of snakes that are bundled up in what we call “healthcare.”
So, ok, it’s dead. I’m pissed off about it, but I just can’t watch this show anymore.
But before we leave the topic, let’s not forget what made us mad about healthcare in the first place. I offer this as epilogue to the whole disheartening drama, an outstanding piece in the current issue of Bloomberg BusinessWeek, The End of Life: Lessons of a $618,616 Death.
P.S. Would it be too much to ask members of Congress to give up their benefits and be forced to seek insurance from the vaunted private sector?
Addendum: Christopher Buckley seems to agree with me, coming from a slightly different perspective. Here from The Daily Beast.
» 1 Comment




